How exactly does remotely spying on kids practicing gymnastics make them safer?

Read the entire report here: https://jasonhunyar.substack.com/p/why-are-flock-employees-watching-720?r=7c08v8

I don't care if it's for technical reasons, product demos, or whatever excuse we'll hear. There is simply no acceptable reason to remotely view children via a preschool or private gym's cameras unless a serious crime was committed.

I want to be 100% clear here about something I don't take lightly. This post is NOT accusing anyone of pedophilia, and I'm not saying that because a lawyer told me to.

I do not know why they were accessed, but there certainly ARE reasons these cameras may have been accessed by employees that are not personal, such as product demos to other clients. I do not think that is an appropriate reason because the people in the community center did not consent, nor have a reason to believe that they were being watched by Flock employees or police via a remote location.

Regardless of the reason, I do not think it was appropriate, and it's up to the community center and its members on how seriously they want to take it or if they want to file charges.

I can't police every comment, nor do I want to, but please do consider that frivolous pedo accusations often chip away at the seriousness of circumstances where children were abused.